Comment

05.10.16

Human factors in transfusion

Source: NHE Sep/Oct 16

Paula HB Bolton-Maggs, medical director of the Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT), discusses the impact of human factors in blood transfusion and how errors can be reduced.

SHOT, the UK national haemovigilance scheme, published its annual report for events in 2015 in July this year. Since its inception in 1996 the most common adverse incidents in relation to transfusion are caused by human error, now more properly called ‘human factors’. 

There is increased recognition of two important features: first that ‘to err is human’ or ‘we all do daft stuff’, and secondly that the environment in which we work, our training, staffing levels and work patterns all may influence how we make mistakes. 

Rather than blaming the individual, every error in medicine can be examined to understand the contributory circumstances with a view to changing the environment (ergonomics) or other factors such as staffing. Human factors is now a recognised science. Errors are thought to contribute to death and morbidity across medical practice and not just in relation to transfusion, and recently were reckoned as the third leading cause of death in the US. Human factors training is now recommended and we need to learn to be situationally aware of the factors contributing to error such as multi-tasking, interruption and distraction.  

Reports to SHOT demonstrate an increasing trend of organisational and staff factors contributing to breakdown of care, at worst linked to the death of the patient. Such factors include failures in continuity of care, multiple teams involved with poor handover, long shifts, and failure to escalate to senior staff when monitoring triggers high-risk scores. Reports of delayed transfusion with fatal outcome have increased and are usually multifactorial. For instance, several factors contributed to a complete breakdown in communication between a stem cell transplant unit and the associated transfusion laboratory for several months, resulting in inappropriate management of transfusion for several patients.  

Reporting and feedback need to be improved 

The NHS Staff Survey in 2015 demonstrated that less than half the respondents felt that their organisation treated staff involved in incidents fairly and only half  reported adequate feedback. Recently multiple warnings have been given by senior Royal College representatives about the staffing crisis with insufficient staff to cover rotas in paediatrics, medicine and emergency departments. This has included using social media with the hashtag #mindtherotagap. All these factors increase risk to patients. It may be easier to blame an individual than to adequately address the surrounding organisational and staffing factors when people and resources are spread too thin.  We talk about a blame-free culture, but the number of health professionals facing criminal investigation into ‘potentially avoidable deaths’ is increasing. These pressures contribute to a reluctance to report, and an exodus either to another country or early retirement with the loss of valuable experience, also evident in laboratory staff. Without a reliable and adequately staffed pathology service a hospital cannot function. 

Near-miss incidents are very informative. One of the most dangerous errors in transfusion is the inadvertent transfusion of an ABO-incompatible unit of red cells (a ‘never event’). About 10 of these are reported each year but only a third of these are associated with harm or death. These serious incidents have resulted in staff dismissals and/or criminal prosecutions. A review of all never events noted that reporting in hospital quality accounts ‘is neither consistently transparent nor adequate … the true root cause is likely to be organisational rather than individual’, further evidence of failure to engage with the human factors that underlie these mistakes. 

Near-miss incidents comprise a third of the 3,500 or so SHOT reports each year; most of these are instances of blood sampling from the wrong patient. In 2015, we noted that there were at least 288 instances where a wrong blood sample could have resulted in an ABO-incompatible transfusion if it had not been detected. Most were detected because a previous sample gave a different blood group. These wrong samples are most often taken by medical staff and occur mainly because the patient has not been properly identified and/or the blood sample is labelled away from the patient. The ratio of such near miss to actual wrong transfusions is about 100 to one. 

Recommendations from SHOT 

Recognition that we have not had much impact on these errors in transfusion over the last decade has resulted in detailed human factors analysis of some cases reported to SHOT which display failures of communication, exacerbated by shift patterns and lack of continuity of care in hospital practice. These issues are not peculiar to transfusion but are seen across medical practice and other factors in the patient journey contribute to transfusion adverse outcomes. 

Blood transfusion involves nine steps  each of which may be completed by a different healthcare professional. In both 2015 and 2014, 78% of all incidents analysed by SHOT were error-related. Only 10% were not preventable (e.g. acute allergic transfusion reactions which are idiosyncratic). An additional notable feature is that in the nine-step process transfusion errors are frequently multiple (median number three). Identification of the correct patient at the time of blood sampling and at the time of transfusion is key, yet staff make assumptions and take shortcuts, and then do not perform this positive patient identification correctly. There are some parts of medicine where a checklist is essential, and SHOT recommends a five-point bedside checklist as the blood component is attached to the patient. This would prevent deaths and other serious complications. 

The greatest number of deaths and serious harm in transfusion result from pulmonary complications (55% over the last six years), most commonly related to transfusion-associated circulatory overload. Many of these cases might be prevented by more thorough pre-transfusion assessment and single unit transfusions followed by reassessment. The second recommendation from SHOT this year is a checklist and tool for this .

 Figure 2 copy edit

Our advice is to be WARM – Work Accurately and Reduce Mistakes. Blood components are now very safe but our practice needs improvement. Despite this, transfusion remains very safe in the UK with a risk of death where the transfusion was contributory of approximately one in 100,000 components issued.

FOR MORE INFORMATION

W: www.shotuk.org

Comments

There are no comments. Why not be the first?

Add your comment

 

national health executive tv

more videos >

latest healthcare news

NHS England’s chief nurse to take up role as London regional director

21/08/2017NHS England’s chief nurse to take up role as London regional director

England’s chief nurse Professor Jane Cummings will take charge of the London region until a permanent regional director is found, NHS Engla... more >
Risk assessments not carried out before teenager’s death at Southern Health

21/08/2017Risk assessments not carried out before teenager’s death at Southern Health

Regular risk assessments were not carried out by the psychiatrist responsible for Connor Sparrowhawk when the teenager died in 2013, a tribunal h... more >
Too many older patients ‘suffering in silence’ over complaint concerns

21/08/2017Too many older patients ‘suffering in silence’ over complaint concerns

Concern has been raised by the families of older patients this week who say that it is too difficult to complain about the hospital care or treat... more >
681 149x260 NHE Subscribe button

the scalpel's daily blog

We need your Health Heroes!

21/08/2017We need your Health Heroes!

We are once again delighted to be the official media partner for the Our Health Heroes Awards, working alongside Skills for Health to celebrate those in our healthcare workforce who go above and beyond the call of duty. It’s important that the fantastic contributions healthcare workers are making across the UK every day don’t go unnoticed. Working on the frontline of patient care, they are the reason hospitals, trusts, care ... more >
read more blog posts from 'the scalpel' >

interviews

Improving care at the touch of a screen

08/08/2017Improving care at the touch of a screen

When it comes to dementia, having a calm and safe environment can have a substantial impact on a patient’s quality of life. NHE’s Jos... more >
A new approach to talent management

25/07/2017A new approach to talent management

Martin Hancock, national lead for talent management at NHS Leadership Academy, and Gill Rooke, the organisation’s senior operations manager... more >
Enabling greater integration through ACSs

25/07/2017Enabling greater integration through ACSs

At this year’s NHS Confed, Simon Stevens revealed the first wave of accountable care systems (ACSs). NHE speaks to Ian Dodge, the director ... more >
How NHS organisations can protect themselves against cyber crime

25/07/2017How NHS organisations can protect themselves against cyber crime

On 12 May, a global cyber-attack occurred on an unprecedented scale. It affected organisations across the globe and, though it did not specifical... more >

last word

Your personality, your leadership

Your personality, your leadership

Deirdre Wallace, clinical skills manager at UCL Medical School, discusses the importance of learning about leadership and self while at medical school. Approximately five years ago, I was ch... more > more last word articles >

editor's comment

13/06/2017Tackling the major challenges facing the NHS

As you will have gathered from the front cover, a theme that runs throughout this edition of NHE is about empowering and involving the workforce in order to deliver innovative change across the system.  Professor Jane Dacre, president of the Royal College of Physicians, highlights on page 16 the importance of sustainability and trans... read more >

health service focus

Securing the health service with openness and transparency

08/08/2017Securing the health service with openness and transparency

Mike Lees, head of business security at Barns... more >
Transforming health and care: the Dorset story

08/08/2017Transforming health and care: the Dorset story

Phil Richardson, Dorset STP lead director, ex... more >