Comment

05.10.16

Human factors in transfusion

Source: NHE Sep/Oct 16

Paula HB Bolton-Maggs, medical director of the Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT), discusses the impact of human factors in blood transfusion and how errors can be reduced.

SHOT, the UK national haemovigilance scheme, published its annual report for events in 2015 in July this year. Since its inception in 1996 the most common adverse incidents in relation to transfusion are caused by human error, now more properly called ‘human factors’. 

There is increased recognition of two important features: first that ‘to err is human’ or ‘we all do daft stuff’, and secondly that the environment in which we work, our training, staffing levels and work patterns all may influence how we make mistakes. 

Rather than blaming the individual, every error in medicine can be examined to understand the contributory circumstances with a view to changing the environment (ergonomics) or other factors such as staffing. Human factors is now a recognised science. Errors are thought to contribute to death and morbidity across medical practice and not just in relation to transfusion, and recently were reckoned as the third leading cause of death in the US. Human factors training is now recommended and we need to learn to be situationally aware of the factors contributing to error such as multi-tasking, interruption and distraction.  

Reports to SHOT demonstrate an increasing trend of organisational and staff factors contributing to breakdown of care, at worst linked to the death of the patient. Such factors include failures in continuity of care, multiple teams involved with poor handover, long shifts, and failure to escalate to senior staff when monitoring triggers high-risk scores. Reports of delayed transfusion with fatal outcome have increased and are usually multifactorial. For instance, several factors contributed to a complete breakdown in communication between a stem cell transplant unit and the associated transfusion laboratory for several months, resulting in inappropriate management of transfusion for several patients.  

Reporting and feedback need to be improved 

The NHS Staff Survey in 2015 demonstrated that less than half the respondents felt that their organisation treated staff involved in incidents fairly and only half  reported adequate feedback. Recently multiple warnings have been given by senior Royal College representatives about the staffing crisis with insufficient staff to cover rotas in paediatrics, medicine and emergency departments. This has included using social media with the hashtag #mindtherotagap. All these factors increase risk to patients. It may be easier to blame an individual than to adequately address the surrounding organisational and staffing factors when people and resources are spread too thin.  We talk about a blame-free culture, but the number of health professionals facing criminal investigation into ‘potentially avoidable deaths’ is increasing. These pressures contribute to a reluctance to report, and an exodus either to another country or early retirement with the loss of valuable experience, also evident in laboratory staff. Without a reliable and adequately staffed pathology service a hospital cannot function. 

Near-miss incidents are very informative. One of the most dangerous errors in transfusion is the inadvertent transfusion of an ABO-incompatible unit of red cells (a ‘never event’). About 10 of these are reported each year but only a third of these are associated with harm or death. These serious incidents have resulted in staff dismissals and/or criminal prosecutions. A review of all never events noted that reporting in hospital quality accounts ‘is neither consistently transparent nor adequate … the true root cause is likely to be organisational rather than individual’, further evidence of failure to engage with the human factors that underlie these mistakes. 

Near-miss incidents comprise a third of the 3,500 or so SHOT reports each year; most of these are instances of blood sampling from the wrong patient. In 2015, we noted that there were at least 288 instances where a wrong blood sample could have resulted in an ABO-incompatible transfusion if it had not been detected. Most were detected because a previous sample gave a different blood group. These wrong samples are most often taken by medical staff and occur mainly because the patient has not been properly identified and/or the blood sample is labelled away from the patient. The ratio of such near miss to actual wrong transfusions is about 100 to one. 

Recommendations from SHOT 

Recognition that we have not had much impact on these errors in transfusion over the last decade has resulted in detailed human factors analysis of some cases reported to SHOT which display failures of communication, exacerbated by shift patterns and lack of continuity of care in hospital practice. These issues are not peculiar to transfusion but are seen across medical practice and other factors in the patient journey contribute to transfusion adverse outcomes. 

Blood transfusion involves nine steps  each of which may be completed by a different healthcare professional. In both 2015 and 2014, 78% of all incidents analysed by SHOT were error-related. Only 10% were not preventable (e.g. acute allergic transfusion reactions which are idiosyncratic). An additional notable feature is that in the nine-step process transfusion errors are frequently multiple (median number three). Identification of the correct patient at the time of blood sampling and at the time of transfusion is key, yet staff make assumptions and take shortcuts, and then do not perform this positive patient identification correctly. There are some parts of medicine where a checklist is essential, and SHOT recommends a five-point bedside checklist as the blood component is attached to the patient. This would prevent deaths and other serious complications. 

The greatest number of deaths and serious harm in transfusion result from pulmonary complications (55% over the last six years), most commonly related to transfusion-associated circulatory overload. Many of these cases might be prevented by more thorough pre-transfusion assessment and single unit transfusions followed by reassessment. The second recommendation from SHOT this year is a checklist and tool for this .

 Figure 2 copy edit

Our advice is to be WARM – Work Accurately and Reduce Mistakes. Blood components are now very safe but our practice needs improvement. Despite this, transfusion remains very safe in the UK with a risk of death where the transfusion was contributory of approximately one in 100,000 components issued.

FOR MORE INFORMATION

W: www.shotuk.org

Comments

There are no comments. Why not be the first?

Add your comment

 

national health executive tv

more videos >

latest healthcare news

Nearly a quarter of reception children in England overweight

20/10/2017Nearly a quarter of reception children in England overweight

Nearly a quarter of school children in reception classes in England are overweight – and the figure goes up to almost a third by year six. ... more >
Scrapping staff assault data collection to create ‘dangerous blind spot’

20/10/2017Scrapping staff assault data collection to create ‘dangerous blind spot’

The government has revealed that it will no longer keep regularly tracking NHS staff assaults. Since NHS Protect was scrapped this year, the... more >
MPs endorse Baroness Harding as new NHSI chair

20/10/2017MPs endorse Baroness Harding as new NHSI chair

The government’s Health Select Committee has endorsed Baroness Harding as the next chair of NHS Improvement (NHSI). The committee look... more >
681 149x260 NHE Subscribe button

the scalpel's daily blog

Our Health Heroes: NHS awards ceremony unveils shortlist

18/10/2017Our Health Heroes: NHS awards ceremony unveils shortlist

With the NHS facing unprecedented demand and difficult working conditions, it’s incredible that the workforce across the country still delivers great care to patients every single day. Requiring care is never a pleasant experience, but having a brilliant member of staff look after can make a huge difference to a quick recovery. For that reason, it’s important to recognise the support staff who work so hard to give patients p... more >
read more blog posts from 'the scalpel' >

interviews

Tackling infection prevention locally

04/10/2017Tackling infection prevention locally

Dr Emma Burnett, a lecturer and researcher in infection prevention at the University of Dundee’s School of Nursing and Midwifery and a boar... more >
Scan4Safety: benefits across the whole supply chain

02/10/2017Scan4Safety: benefits across the whole supply chain

NHE interviews Gillian Fox, head of eProcurement (Scan4Safety) programme at NHS Supply Chain. How has the Scan4Safety initiative evolved sin... more >
Simon Stevens: A hunger for innovation

25/09/2017Simon Stevens: A hunger for innovation

Simon Stevens, chief executive of NHS England, knows that the health service is already a world leader when it comes to medical advances – ... more >
Improving care at the touch of a screen

08/08/2017Improving care at the touch of a screen

When it comes to dementia, having a calm and safe environment can have a substantial impact on a patient’s quality of life. NHE’s Jos... more >

last word

The Refugee Doctor Initiative

The Refugee Doctor Initiative

Terry John, co-chair of the BMA & BDA Refugee Doctors and Dentists Liaison Group and chair of the union’s international committee, talks about a brilliant initiative that is proving mut... more > more last word articles >

editor's comment

25/09/2017A hotbed of innovation

This edition of NHE comes hot on the heels of this year’s NHS Expo which, once again, proved to be a huge success at Manchester Central. A number of announcements were made during the event, with the health secretary naming the second wave of NHS digital pioneers, or ‘fast followers’, which follow the initial global digital e... read more >

health service focus

Women power usage and uptake of myGP®

18/10/2017Women power usage and uptake of myGP®

Advertisement Feature: Lemarie Moses, prod... more >
Why don’t you write to your patients

11/10/2017Why don’t you write to your patients

The president of the Royal College of Surgeon... more >