14.03.13
Conflict of interest for third of CCG GPs
Over a third of GPs on new clinical commissioning group (CCG) boards have a potential conflict of interest, new research shows.
A code of conduct states that members must remove themselves from decisions if they could benefit from the outcome.
An analysis conducted by the BMJ looked into the interests of 83% of 211 boards which will come into power from April. 36% of 1,179 GPs on the executive boards had a financial interest in a for-profit provider beyond their own practice and 12% had declared links with not-for-profit organisations that could present conflicts of interest.
The BMJ's editor in chief, Dr Fiona Godlee, said: “These conflicts will make the commissioning of some services difficult. Although board members can excuse themselves from meetings when conflicts arise, this could mean some decisions are made by a group of predominantly lay people.”
Dr Laurence Buckman, chair of the BMA's GP committee, said: “In our view, GPs who are directors of, or who have significant financial interests in, companies who might be awarded contracts to provide services should seriously consider their membership of CCG governing bodies. Alternatively, they should consider their position within provider companies.”
Shadow health secretary, Andy Burnham MP, said: “Patients and public want those entrusted with making decisions about the NHS to have its best interests at heart. They will be shocked to learn that so many have a potential conflict of interest.”
Dr Clare Gerada, chair of the Royal College of General Practitioners, said: “If conflicts of interest in CCGs are not