Last Word

01.06.15

The cost of demanding savings mustn’t be patient choice

Source: NHE May/June 15

 Chris Whitehouse, who chairs the Urology Trade Association, discusses the day-to-day impacts on patients of decisions over efficiency, consumables and devices.

The NHS is creaking at the seams. Swamped by demands, the NHS has to perform near miracles on a daily basis – treating patients with resources barely sufficient for the task. 

It’s evident that greater investment coupled to better use of resources in the health service will be required as need builds to predicted levels by 2020. The oft-quoted figure from the Five Year Forward View is that an extra £8bn a year is needed. But £22bn in savings is also needed – additional to the ‘Nicholson Challenge’ of £20bn in savings during the last Parliament. 

The NHS doesn’t just need more money. It needs to use what it has more efficiently. 

But, while simply writing the NHS a blank cheque would be impossible for any government, the challenge for the health service is how it can make efficiencies without sacrificing patient choice. This could happen if, in a scramble to save money, patients are left without access to the products that will have the greatest positive impact upon their quality of life. 

Such a situation would have a profound impact on patients, particularly those with chronic and degenerative conditions, such MS, or congenital conditions such as spina bifida. It would fundamentally affect their quality of life by potentially meaning they would no longer have access to the treatments, medication and devices that best meet their individual needs, when their daily reality involves catheterisation to manage continence problems. 

There is an ongoing debate amongst experts as to the benefits and flaws of both multi-catheterisation – requiring patients to re-use the same catheter – and single-use catheters. Single-use catheters are used by patients with chronic conditions, with these not requiring repeated cleaning. The rationale has been to improve the patient’s quality of life while minimising the risk of urinary tract infection. 

Much work has and is being undertaken to determine whether multi-use catheters could be used without additional risk of UTIs (urinary tract infections), and whether such products can be used without requiring changes to a patient’s lifestyle or quality of life. This work is welcome, provided it gives patients more rather than fewer treatment and management options. 

This is the critical point. No-one is suggesting patients have carte-blanche to call upon NHS resources, but even at a time when the NHS is having to make unprecedented savings, there is a need to reconcile this with patients’ needs. There is a danger that, to take catheters as an example, decisions on what is or is not available to patients is made primarily based on cost. Whilst this must be a factor, it cannot be the overriding one. 

Taking decisions on the availability of medical devices like catheters based on cost would not only be against patients’ best interests, but also those of the health service itself in the longer term. Catheters, as an example, are by their nature intimate products. The needs of those using them vary greatly – ranging from dexterity issues to a need to be discreet or allow catheterisation while out and about. In short, they allow patients to live more normal lives. In prioritising short-term savings, the NHS would push patients to products delivering worse clinical outcomes, which affect patients’ dignity and their opportunity for economic and social participation. Long term, they might need additional health support, negating short-term savings. 

The financial state of the NHS is a perilous one. It requires a firmer footing, based on the best available care, if it is to meet the needs of our populations by 2020. Addressing the problem requires additional funding, but also a more informed population taking responsibility for its health and supporting better value for money through efficient use of resources. 

Whether this involves a degree of rationing or not is something we will see over the longer term. But it would be a betrayal of NHS’s principles if the push for financial savings placed treatments and devices out of the reach of patients with chronic conditions. Such a development would be ineffective and short sighted. 

Quite simply, for all the funding drama, the NHS must find a way to reconcile balancing the books with continuing to support patient choice, and allowing patients to manage their condition with dignity and independence.

Tell us what you think – have your say below or email opinion@nationalhealthexecutive.com

Comments

There are no comments. Why not be the first?

Add your comment

 

national health executive tv

more videos >

latest healthcare news

Highest ever numbers accept GP training posts

19/10/2018Highest ever numbers accept GP training posts

The number of people entering GP training is the highest in NHS history, according to new figures from Health Education England (HEE). A tot... more >
‘No realistic prospect of progress’ for integrated health and social care, PAC warns

19/10/2018‘No realistic prospect of progress’ for integrated health and social care, PAC warns

The government is still “a long way” from achieving an effective strategy for integrated health and social care and has been urged to... more >
One in six trusts could end PFI contracts due to poor performance as NHS heads for £1bn loss

19/10/2018One in six trusts could end PFI contracts due to poor performance as NHS heads for £1bn loss

A new report has revealed that 15% of all NHS trusts using private finance initiatives (PFI) could terminate contracts due to poor performance. ... more >
Council strips contract from NHS trusts and hands it to Virgin after High Court row

18/10/2018Council strips contract from NHS trusts and hands it to Virgin after High Court row

Lancashire County Council (LCC) has awarded a controversial £104m healthcare contract to Virgin Care for the second time after a hearing in... more >

interviews

Duncan Selbie: A step on the journey to population health

24/01/2018Duncan Selbie: A step on the journey to population health

The NHS plays a part in the country’s wellness – but it’s far from being all that matters. Duncan Selbie, chief executive of Pu... more >
Cutting through the fake news

22/11/2017Cutting through the fake news

In an era of so-called ‘fake news’ growing alongside a renewed focus on reducing stigma around mental health, Paul Farmer, chief exec... more >
Tackling infection prevention locally

04/10/2017Tackling infection prevention locally

Dr Emma Burnett, a lecturer and researcher in infection prevention at the University of Dundee’s School of Nursing and Midwifery and a boar... more >
Scan4Safety: benefits across the whole supply chain

02/10/2017Scan4Safety: benefits across the whole supply chain

NHE interviews Gillian Fox, head of eProcurement (Scan4Safety) programme at NHS Supply Chain. How has the Scan4Safety initiative evolved sin... more >
Simon Stevens: A hunger for innovation

25/09/2017Simon Stevens: A hunger for innovation

Simon Stevens, chief executive of NHS England, knows that the health service is already a world leader when it comes to medical advances – ... more >

last word

Hard to be optimistic

Hard to be optimistic

Rachel Power, chief executive of the Patients Association, warns that we must be realistic about the very real effects of continued underfunding across the health service. It’s now bey... more > more last word articles >

comment

Recoup and recover

10/10/2018Recoup and recover

The ease and round-the-clock nature of making cashless payments has transformed the way we pay for goods and services – and, from now on, t... more >
The clinical voice at the heart of procurement

10/10/2018The clinical voice at the heart of procurement

Jo Gander, director of the Clinical and Product Assurance (CaPA) team, talks about their role as part of the new NHS Supply Chain. NHS Suppl... more >
Deal or no deal?

10/10/2018Deal or no deal?

Dr Andrew Dearden, BMA treasurer and Brexit lead, takes a look at what different Brexit scenarios could means for both patients and healthcare pr... more >
A push for digital in mental health

10/10/2018A push for digital in mental health

Sean Duggan, chief executive of NHS Confederation’s Mental Health Network, argues that mental health services could hugely benefit from dig... more >

the scalpel's daily blog

On your bike!

17/10/2018On your bike!

Sathish Sethuraman, travel and transport plan co-ordinator at Northumbria Healthcare NHS FT, explains how efforts to promote cycling to work at the trust are resulting in more staff travelling on two wheels. At Northumbria Healthcare, we are committed to becoming a greener organisation and reducing the environmental impact of delivering p... more >
read more blog posts from 'the scalpel' >