Last Word


The cost of demanding savings mustn’t be patient choice

Source: NHE May/June 15

 Chris Whitehouse, who chairs the Urology Trade Association, discusses the day-to-day impacts on patients of decisions over efficiency, consumables and devices.

The NHS is creaking at the seams. Swamped by demands, the NHS has to perform near miracles on a daily basis – treating patients with resources barely sufficient for the task. 

It’s evident that greater investment coupled to better use of resources in the health service will be required as need builds to predicted levels by 2020. The oft-quoted figure from the Five Year Forward View is that an extra £8bn a year is needed. But £22bn in savings is also needed – additional to the ‘Nicholson Challenge’ of £20bn in savings during the last Parliament. 

The NHS doesn’t just need more money. It needs to use what it has more efficiently. 

But, while simply writing the NHS a blank cheque would be impossible for any government, the challenge for the health service is how it can make efficiencies without sacrificing patient choice. This could happen if, in a scramble to save money, patients are left without access to the products that will have the greatest positive impact upon their quality of life. 

Such a situation would have a profound impact on patients, particularly those with chronic and degenerative conditions, such MS, or congenital conditions such as spina bifida. It would fundamentally affect their quality of life by potentially meaning they would no longer have access to the treatments, medication and devices that best meet their individual needs, when their daily reality involves catheterisation to manage continence problems. 

There is an ongoing debate amongst experts as to the benefits and flaws of both multi-catheterisation – requiring patients to re-use the same catheter – and single-use catheters. Single-use catheters are used by patients with chronic conditions, with these not requiring repeated cleaning. The rationale has been to improve the patient’s quality of life while minimising the risk of urinary tract infection. 

Much work has and is being undertaken to determine whether multi-use catheters could be used without additional risk of UTIs (urinary tract infections), and whether such products can be used without requiring changes to a patient’s lifestyle or quality of life. This work is welcome, provided it gives patients more rather than fewer treatment and management options. 

This is the critical point. No-one is suggesting patients have carte-blanche to call upon NHS resources, but even at a time when the NHS is having to make unprecedented savings, there is a need to reconcile this with patients’ needs. There is a danger that, to take catheters as an example, decisions on what is or is not available to patients is made primarily based on cost. Whilst this must be a factor, it cannot be the overriding one. 

Taking decisions on the availability of medical devices like catheters based on cost would not only be against patients’ best interests, but also those of the health service itself in the longer term. Catheters, as an example, are by their nature intimate products. The needs of those using them vary greatly – ranging from dexterity issues to a need to be discreet or allow catheterisation while out and about. In short, they allow patients to live more normal lives. In prioritising short-term savings, the NHS would push patients to products delivering worse clinical outcomes, which affect patients’ dignity and their opportunity for economic and social participation. Long term, they might need additional health support, negating short-term savings. 

The financial state of the NHS is a perilous one. It requires a firmer footing, based on the best available care, if it is to meet the needs of our populations by 2020. Addressing the problem requires additional funding, but also a more informed population taking responsibility for its health and supporting better value for money through efficient use of resources. 

Whether this involves a degree of rationing or not is something we will see over the longer term. But it would be a betrayal of NHS’s principles if the push for financial savings placed treatments and devices out of the reach of patients with chronic conditions. Such a development would be ineffective and short sighted. 

Quite simply, for all the funding drama, the NHS must find a way to reconcile balancing the books with continuing to support patient choice, and allowing patients to manage their condition with dignity and independence.

Tell us what you think – have your say below or email


There are no comments. Why not be the first?

Add your comment


national health executive tv

more videos >

latest healthcare news

Councillors fear identity crisis following CCG merger

22/06/2018Councillors fear identity crisis following CCG merger

Members of one of Kent’s leading councils have voiced their concerns against an upcoming merger between CCGs in the area. Cllr Wendy P... more >
Top NHS England boss to leave the organisation

22/06/2018Top NHS England boss to leave the organisation

NHS England’s chief financial officer will leave the post after 11 years. Paul Baumann CBE, who joined NHS London in 2007, and took up... more >
Most urgent primary care services ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’

22/06/2018Most urgent primary care services ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’

Over eight in 10 primary care services are providing good care, despite mounting work force and commissioning pressures, the CQC has said. A... more >
Gosport scandal: ‘Blame culture’ must end says Hunt, practice ‘probably repeated elsewhere’

21/06/2018Gosport scandal: ‘Blame culture’ must end says Hunt, practice ‘probably repeated elsewhere’

Health and social care secretary Jeremy Hunt has hit back at claims from an expert on hospital mortality that the Gosport War Memorial scand... more >


Duncan Selbie: A step on the journey to population health

24/01/2018Duncan Selbie: A step on the journey to population health

The NHS plays a part in the country’s wellness – but it’s far from being all that matters. Duncan Selbie, chief executive of Pu... more >
Cutting through the fake news

22/11/2017Cutting through the fake news

In an era of so-called ‘fake news’ growing alongside a renewed focus on reducing stigma around mental health, Paul Farmer, chief exec... more >
Tackling infection prevention locally

04/10/2017Tackling infection prevention locally

Dr Emma Burnett, a lecturer and researcher in infection prevention at the University of Dundee’s School of Nursing and Midwifery and a boar... more >
Scan4Safety: benefits across the whole supply chain

02/10/2017Scan4Safety: benefits across the whole supply chain

NHE interviews Gillian Fox, head of eProcurement (Scan4Safety) programme at NHS Supply Chain. How has the Scan4Safety initiative evolved sin... more >
Simon Stevens: A hunger for innovation

25/09/2017Simon Stevens: A hunger for innovation

Simon Stevens, chief executive of NHS England, knows that the health service is already a world leader when it comes to medical advances – ... more >

last word

Hard to be optimistic

Hard to be optimistic

Rachel Power, chief executive of the Patients Association, warns that we must be realistic about the very real effects of continued underfunding across the health service. It’s now bey... more > more last word articles >


Getting more out of our medicines

20/06/2018Getting more out of our medicines

Paul Chrisp, programme director of medicines and technologies at NICE, describes how the organisation is re-purposing drugs in order to improve p... more >
Under attack

20/06/2018Under attack

One attack against an NHS worker is one too many. But unfortunately, the trend in recent years has been alarmingly upwards, with no part of the N... more >
Lessons from WannaCry

20/06/2018Lessons from WannaCry

Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, a member of the Public Accounts Committee, warns that the UK Government must take seriously the threat of a more soph... more >
A hostile environment

20/06/2018A hostile environment

Dr Terry John, chair of the BMA’s international committee, gives his thoughts on the government’s visa and immigration policy and its... more >

the scalpel's daily blog

The impact of NICE on cardiovascular disease prevention

06/06/2018The impact of NICE on cardiovascular disease prevention

Professor Gillian Leng, deputy chief executive and director Health and Social Care at NICE, looks into what can be done to decrease cardiovascular disease nationally and how to prevent missed opportunities in the future. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) accounts for just over a quarter of deaths and affects around 7 million people in the UK. ... more >
read more blog posts from 'the scalpel' >