ICO: Patient data transfer to Google DeepMind by trust deemed unlawful

The Royal Free NHS FT failed to comply with data protection laws when it provided the data about 1.6 million patients to Google DeepMind for the trial of an app, the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has today ruled.

The information had been given to the AI arm of Google, called DeepMind, by the London trust at the end of last year as part of a trial to test an alert, diagnosis and detection app for acute kidney failure, called Streams.

It was hoped that once developed, Streams would speed up the time to alert clinicians of patients in need and free up over half a million hours a year for patient care.  

But in May this year, the National Data Guardian (NDG) Dame Fiona Caldicott said that the transfer of data may have been transferred on a “inappropriate legal basis” as patients had not directly consented to sharing their data.

And the ICO has today ruled that there were shortcomings in how the data was handled, and has set out areas where the trust must commit to improving its track record with protecting its patient’s data.

Since the ICO investigation, the trust has been told to establish a legal basis under the Data Protection Act for the Google DeepMind project, as well as set out how it will comply with its duty of confidence to patients in the future.

It was also asked to complete a privacy impact assessment, with specific steps to ensure transparency and also commission an audit of the trail, the results of which will be shared with the ICO.

“There’s no doubt the huge potential that creative use of data could have on patient care and clinical improvements, but the price of innovation does not need to be the erosion of fundamental privacy rights,” said Elizabeth Denham, Information Commissioner.

“Our investigation found a number of shortcomings in the way patient records were shared for this trial,” she added. “Patients would not have reasonably expected their information to have been used in this way, and the Trust could and should have been far more transparent with patients as to what was happening.

“We’ve asked the trust to commit to making changes that will address those shortcomings, and their co-operation is welcome. The Data Protection Act is not a barrier to innovation, but it does need to be considered wherever people’s data is being used.”

A spokesperson for the trust said that the driving force behind Streams had always been the power of technology to improve care for patients, and were pleased that the app could still be used to help vulnerable get the quickest care possible.

“We have co-operated fully with the ICO’s investigation which began in May 2016 and it is helpful to receive some guidance on the issue about how patient information can be processed to test new technology,” they said. “We also welcome the decision of the Department of Health to publish updated guidance for the wider NHS in the near future.”

They added that the trust accepted the ICO’s findings, and had already made good progress to address the areas where there were still concerns.

“We are now doing much more to keep our patients informed about how their data is used,” they continued. “We would like to reassure patients that their information has been in our control at all times and has never been used for anything other than delivering patient care or ensuring their safety.

“We look forward to working with the ICO to ensure that other hospitals can benefit from the lessons we have learnt.”

Have you got a story to tell? Would you like to become an NHE columnist? If so, click here.   


Dominic Morgan   04/07/2017 at 08:20

Data protection issues aside, I'd like to know more about how a single app, focused on a single condition could free up 500,000 hours a year? by my calculations that's over 260 full time staff, every year. Is this in one hospital? or country-wide? does it assume 100% uptake and adoption of the app across every care setting in the country? I'm afraid claims like this are completely meaningless until they have been put into some context, and frankly, they are irresponsible. Ridiculous claims like this just devalue any well-worked, calculated benefits analysis figures for other innovative systems.

Hermit Singh   04/07/2017 at 12:53

Deeply, minded to distrust tax-evading corporations with pretty much anything to do with public health priorities.. ..after all, if the bar-stewards paid taxes IN, & TO the myriad countries that generate their obscene,illicit profit-dominions Well then those "impoverished " (by tax evasion) governments could, well.. Perhaps spend more money on, say public health

Ruth Bruce   04/07/2017 at 22:23

It's an interesting dilemma - improved patient outcomes v personal liberties. The outcome of Improved Guidelines is constructive and acknowledges the partnership role that technology can play in health.

Add your comment


national health executive tv

more videos >

latest news

View all News


Building a solid evidence base

18/04/2018Building a solid evidence base

Danielle Doyle of THIS Institute, co-created by the University of Cambridge... more >
Forensics v fraud

18/04/2018Forensics v fraud

Gareth Ballance, technical lead of the Forensic Computing Unit (FCU), gives... more >

editor's comment

25/09/2017A hotbed of innovation

This edition of NHE comes hot on the heels of this year’s NHS Expo which, once again, proved to be a huge success at Manchester Central. A number of announcements were made during the event, with the health secretary naming the second wave of NHS digital pioneers, or ‘fast followers’, which follow the initial global digital exemplars who were revealed at the same show 12 months earlier.  Jeremy Hunt also stated that by the end of 2018 – the 70th birthday... read more >

last word

Hard to be optimistic

Hard to be optimistic

Rachel Power, chief executive of the Patients Association, warns that we must be realistic about the very real effects of continued underfunding across the health service. It’s now beyond more > more last word articles >


Duncan Selbie: A step on the journey to population health

24/01/2018Duncan Selbie: A step on the journey to population health

The NHS plays a part in the country’s wellness – but it’s... more >

the scalpel's daily blog

NHS long-term funding: what’s in store?

10/04/2018NHS long-term funding: what’s in store?

Anita Charlesworth, director of research and economics at the Health Foundation, discusses Theresa May’s recent announcements on long-term NHS funding and considers the ... more >
read more blog posts from 'the scalpel' >

healthcare events

events calendar


April 2018

mon tue wed thu fri sat sun
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 1 2 3 4 5 6

featured articles

View all News