Do we need to invest more in NHS administration?

Source: NHE May/Jun 17

Vivek Kotecha, research officer at the Centre for Health and the Public Interest (CHPI), argues that there needs to be greater investment in NHS administration.

All large organisations need a well-resourced administration to deliver a good service. In the British Army, the Royal Logistic Corps represents 16% of the entire army, making it the largest Corps. In the NHS managers make up 3% of the workforce (versus 11% of the national workforce), and adding in wider NHS infrastructure support staff brings the total up to 14% (excluding GP practices). The cost of managers is often brought up as an unacceptable waste of NHS money during election campaigning, and NHS England’s Five Year Forward View aims to make around £400m of savings from reducing and streamlining back-office costs by 2020. This raises the questions of whether the NHS is spending too much or perhaps too little on administration, and whether the money spent is being invested in the right areas. 

Firstly, it’s important to make clear what administration is. Its definition can vary and a common one includes managers; ‘central functions’ i.e. payroll, finance, IT, HR, procurement; and estates and property staff, but excludes support for clinical staff. 

So how does the NHS compare with health systems in other countries? OECD data estimates that the UK spends 1.2% of its current health expenditure on NHS administration versus an OECD average of 3%. The administration cost of voluntary health insurance schemes in the UK adds another 1.2% (bringing the overall total to 2.4%), despite covering only 11% of the population. Indeed, the OECD data suggests that social health insurance and compulsory insurance schemes incur higher administration expenditure compared to countries where the government sets coverage. It also suggests that single-payer systems (by government or social security) have lower costs than multi-payer systems, where payers are competing and consumers have more choice over coverage levels. Government coverage and a mostly single-payer system appear to be reasons why the NHS has a lower administration cost compared with other countries. 

The UK’s lower spend does not appear to hinder its ability to provide an internationally comparable service. Patient and physician survey findings from The Commonwealth Fund placed the UK top for co-ordinated care (i.e. information-sharing between primary care physicians, hospitals and specialists) and efficiency (such as avoiding duplicate diagnostic tests, unnecessary A&E admissions and time spent on paperwork). These strengths flow from the advantages of having a national health system which should, in principle, make data sharing easier than in a system with numerous, often competing companies. 

Far from perfect 

However, administration in the English NHS is far from perfect. A Health Select Committee inquiry found that since the 1991 purchaser-provider split administration costs had been rising, and by 2014 the running costs of the healthcare ‘market’ were estimated to have reached £4.5bn a year in a CHPI report by Calum Paton. 

The duplication and complexity of administration has increased, with over 240 NHS trusts and the creation of over 200 CCGs alongside NHS England involved in spending the NHS’s £100bn budget in England. A CHPI report on ‘the contracting NHS’ in 2015 found that there were now 25,000 staff across CCGs and local area teams employed in commissioning, administering and enforcing NHS contracts at an annual cost of £1.5bn a year. 

The unnecessary costs created by duplication in an artificially fragmented system have become an area of focus following Lord Carter’s review of variations in operational productivity in acute hospitals. His report estimated that savings of up to £375m could be made by sharing corporate and administrative back-office services (such as payroll) between different hospital and system integration. 

Savings such as these are welcome, but the Carter reforms focus on improving cost efficiency and do not look into ways to build a better overall administrative system. Staff in NHS administration face outdated IT systems, superfluous paper filing processes and high staff absenteeism from years of underinvestment in back-office functions. Meanwhile the attempt to store patient’s medical information in a single database, via the initiative, was axed due to privacy concerns. 

Despite these setbacks and challenges, investment in these areas is vital, especially as the NHS undergoes another transformation into 44 geographically-based sustainability and transformation partnerships while the apparatus of CCGs and hospitals remain. 

A relatively small workforce of managers is responsible for the smooth running of a £100bn+ business (as large as many listed companies). It is important that a resilient and adaptable administrative service is invested in, across the myriad of NHS organisations, to ensure a well-run NHS for both patients and staff.


There are no comments. Why not be the first?

Add your comment


national health executive tv

more videos >

latest healthcare news

Council and NHS consider merging into a single public authority

20/09/2018Council and NHS consider merging into a single public authority

Scottish Borders Council has put forward plans for a single public authority in the region in a proposed submission to a local government review.... more >
Sir Robert Francis chosen as new Healthwatch chair

20/09/2018Sir Robert Francis chosen as new Healthwatch chair

Healthwatch England has appointed Sir Robert Francis QC as its new a chair, taking over from current chair Jane Mordue after her three-year tenur... more >
Integrated care systems ‘need dedicated funding and law changes to succeed’

20/09/2018Integrated care systems ‘need dedicated funding and law changes to succeed’

National health leaders need to invest time into developing appropriate legislation, reforming regulation, redesigning financial architectures an... more >
681 149x260 NHE Subscribe button

the scalpel's daily blog

Lord Darzi: Seize the opportunity

19/09/2018Lord Darzi: Seize the opportunity

Professor the Lord Darzi of Denham is the Paul Hamlyn chair of surgery at Imperial College, a surgeon working in the NHS and, from 2007-09, was health minister under Labour. Here, he highlights the importance of innovation in the NHS, and the exciting prospects it might bring if we’re brave enough to seize the opportunities ahead. Seventeen years ago, I performed the first operation in the UK using a surgical robot. As it happens,... more >
read more blog posts from 'the scalpel' >


Duncan Selbie: A step on the journey to population health

24/01/2018Duncan Selbie: A step on the journey to population health

The NHS plays a part in the country’s wellness – but it’s far from being all that matters. Duncan Selbie, chief executive of Pu... more >
Cutting through the fake news

22/11/2017Cutting through the fake news

In an era of so-called ‘fake news’ growing alongside a renewed focus on reducing stigma around mental health, Paul Farmer, chief exec... more >
Tackling infection prevention locally

04/10/2017Tackling infection prevention locally

Dr Emma Burnett, a lecturer and researcher in infection prevention at the University of Dundee’s School of Nursing and Midwifery and a boar... more >
Scan4Safety: benefits across the whole supply chain

02/10/2017Scan4Safety: benefits across the whole supply chain

NHE interviews Gillian Fox, head of eProcurement (Scan4Safety) programme at NHS Supply Chain. How has the Scan4Safety initiative evolved sin... more >

last word

Hard to be optimistic

Hard to be optimistic

Rachel Power, chief executive of the Patients Association, warns that we must be realistic about the very real effects of continued underfunding across the health service. It’s now bey... more > more last word articles >

editor's comment

25/09/2017A hotbed of innovation

This edition of NHE comes hot on the heels of this year’s NHS Expo which, once again, proved to be a huge success at Manchester Central. A number of announcements were made during the event, with the health secretary naming the second wave of NHS digital pioneers, or ‘fast followers’, which follow the initial global digital e... read more >

health service focus